The patterns your team feels but hasn’t named yet. Weekly. Free.
Brands I've Built For
What People Say
“Jono is the manager every engineer hopes to work for at least once in their career.”
“Jono may be the most talented technologist I've worked with in my long career.”
“Jono has been my greatest professional accelerant. He provided the framework I needed to grow into a technology leader.”
“A natural born leader ... working with Jono was a masterclass in drive with insane depth of knowledge.”
“Jono excels at building teams and solutions from zero to one.”
“Jono propels any team he is a part of.”
Latest Writing
When AI scales faster than your engineering culture, the codebase tells you the truth.
Six weeks after giving our team AI coding tools without guardrails, the codebase looked like a junk drawer with a CI/CD pipeline. Our first instinct was to fix the AI config. The right answer was to fix the humans first.
AI ships code faster than leaders can evaluate it. The gap between those two speeds is the problem most teams haven't named yet.
GitHub found developers complete tasks 55% faster with AI tools. Nobody measured what happened to the evaluation cycle. That asymmetry is where the real risk lives.
AI is borrowing your technical judgment. The question is whether you'll notice before you can't get it back.
Engineers who spend their days directing AI agents and reviewing generated output are experiencing the same skill decay that managers hit years ago. This is not a tooling problem. It's an atrophy problem.